Defences in tort / edited by Andrew Dyson, James Goudkamp and Fred Wilmot-Smith.

Holdings

Loading holdings...

Record details

Publication details:
Oxford : Hart Publishing, 2015.
Record id:
86632
Series:
Hart studies in private law.
Subject:
Torts -- Congresses.
Torts -- Congresses -- Great Britain.
Defense (Civil procedure) -- Congresses.
Defense (Civil procedure) -- Congresses -- Great Britain.
Torts.
Defence (Civil procedure)
Contents:
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. Central issues in the law of tort defences
Pleading defences in tort : the historical perspective
Defining defences
Tort law's missing excuses
Duties to try and duties to succeed
Balancing defences
Defences and third parties : justifying participation
Justifying necessity as a defence in tort law
A defence of duress in the law of torts?
Nuisance, planning and regulation : the limits of statutory authority
Weaving the law's seamless web : reflections on the illegality defence in tort law
The doctrine of illegality and interference with chattels
Should contributory fault be analogue or digital?
Assumption of risk in a system of strict liability : conceptual tangles and social consequences
Privacy claims : transformation, fault, and the public interest defence
Some recurring issues in relation to limitation of actions.
Summary:
This book is a collection of essays on defences for liability in tort. This is an academic work that seeks to fill an area that has received comparatively little attention to other aspects of tort. There are an impressive lineup of authors, which includes Justice James Edelman and Barbara McDonald. McDonald's contribution is entitled "Privacy Claims, Transformation, Fault, and the Public Interest Defence". In terms of general propositions, McDonald claims that the fault element in tort can influence the available defences. For example, the nature of a claim in negligence means that it is morally justifiable to consider the claimant's behaviour in relation to foreseeable risk. Accordingly, the doctrine of contributory negligence accommodates this justification in the context of negligence based torts. However, a stark contrast exists when the appropriateness of contributory negligence as a defence is analyzed in the context of intentional torts. This is a thought provoking collection.
Note:
Table of contents is taken from the published work with the permission of the publisher.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN:
9781849465267
Phys. description:
xxx, 340 p. ; 25 cm