Chapter 1: Introduction
1.1. The interaction of common law, equity and statute
1.2. The complex entanglement of the interaction
1.3. This work's main claims
1.4. Two examples of the interaction between common law, equity and statute
1.5. Law-making by courts
1.6. Conclusion
Chapter 2: Understanding "Common Law" and "Equity"
2.1. Introduction
2.2. Law's unavoidable ambiguity
2.3. The early history of "common law" and "equity"
2.4. "Common law" and "equity" as bodies of rules and principles
2.5. "Common law" considered alone was and is seriously defective
2.6. "Common law" emerging from decisions on statutes
2.7. "Common law" and "equity" as survivors of an evolutionary process
2.8. Working definitions of “common law” and "equity"
Chapter 3: The Variety of Statutes
3.1. Introduction
3.2. Statutory precedents
3.3. The nature of the problem of the volume and variety of statutes
3.4. Classification depends on purpose
3.5. Four distinctions within statutes
Chapter 4: The Entangled Complexity of Statute Law and Judge-made Law
4.1. Introduction
4.2. A simple example of entanglement - a plaintiff slips on a council footpath
4.3. Why exactly must a testator of sound mind "know and approve" of a will?
4.4. Decisions on s 26(a) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth)
4.5. The differences between judgments and statutes
4.6. The interaction between judge-made law and statute law
4.7. The impact of statute law on judge-made law
4.9. Conclusion
Chapter 5: Five Judicature Fallacies
Chapter 6: Equity and the Judicature Legislation
6.1. Introduction
6.2. Bleak House described an unreformed chancery
6.3. A snapshot of the position in 1872
6.4. The operation of the Judicature legislation
6.5. The effect of ss 24 and 25 of the Judicature Act 1873
6.6. Attempts at legislative reform in New South Wales
6.7. Judicature legislation in New South Wales
6.8. Conclusion: the judicature legislation did not effect substantive "fusion"
Chapter 7: Equity's Continuing Distinctiveness after the Judicature Legislation
7.1. Introduction
7.2. Different conception of law-making
7.3. The role of history
7.4. Common law's self-sufficiency and equity's supplemental nature
7.5. Statutes reinforcing the existence of a distinct body of equity
7.6. Different judicial technique
7.7. Two modern examples
7.6. Conclusion: Equity's distinctiveness in the 21st century
Chapter 8: "There is but one common law of Australia": Fact or Fallacy?
Chapter 9: The Structure of Judge-made Law in Australia
9.1. Introduction
9.2. "One common law of Australia" is a recent development
9.3. Divergence in colonial and State statutes
9.4. The (in)significance of rights of appeal
9.5. The reasoning in Lange that there is "but one common law of Australia"
9.6. The proposition that there is but one common law challenged: Lipohar v The Queen
9.7. Conclusion
Chapter 10: Consequences of the Structure of Judge-made Law in Australia
10.1. Introduction
10.2. Different precedential effect of common law and statutory precedents
10.3. Sections 79 and 80 of the Judiciary Act – introduction
10.4. The former approach to ss 79 and 80 and criticisms of that approach
10.5. Rizeq v Western Australia
10.6. How in light of Rizeq should s 80 be construed?
10.7. The legislative history of ss 79 and 80 of the Judiciary Act
10.8. Conclusions on s 80
Epilogue.