A comparative analysis of constitutional recognition of Aboriginal peoples / Benjamen Franklen Gussen.

Holdings

Loading holdings...

Record details

Publication details:
Melbourne : The University of Melbourne, 2017.
Record id:
200037
Series:
Melbourne University Law Review ; v. 40 no. 3.
Subject:
United Nations. -- General Assembly. -- Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.
Human rights Australia.
Aboriginal Australians -- civil rights.
Aboriginal Australians -- Politics and government.
Constitutional law -- Australia.
Contents:
I. Introduction
II. A topology of constitutional recognition
A. Definition of constitutional recognition
B. Current proposals
C. Recognition in Australia's sub-national constitutions
III. Comparative analysis
A. Constitutional recognition in Canada
B. Constitutional recognition in New Zealand
C. Constitutional recognition in Ecuador
D. Constitutional recognition in Bolivia
IV. Envoi.
Summary:
This article furnishes a comparative analysis on the constitutional recognition of Indigenous peoples in four jurisdictions. The analysis looks at two jurisdictions that share a similar colonial heritage with Australia, namely New Zealand and Canada; and two jurisdictions at the forefront of plurinational constitutional recognition of Indigenous rights (Ecuador and Bolivia). Experience in these countries suggests that constitutional recognition (of Indigenous peoples) occurs in a variety of ways, including the protection and promotion of Indigenous cultures, their land titles and their political representation. This variety stems largely from a common denominator: the need for protecting the political, collective rights of marginalised groups. This protection is generally intended to alleviate these groups' economic and social disadvantages. The analysis identifies two dimensions for constitutional recognition: a wide-versus-narrow dimension and a dynamic-versus-static dimension. Both dimensions break along colonial lines, with recognition in the two postcolonial countries exhibiting a wide and static approach and recognition in the two plurinational countries exhibiting a narrow but dynamic approach. These jurisdictions could provide guidance in the Australian context, where resolving the tension between our colonial heritage and our postcolonial aspirations holds the key to alleviating the disadvantages facing Indigenous Australians. - Abstract.
Note:
Includes bibliographical references.
Phys. description:
1 online resource (pages 793-844) : digital, PDF